The European Commission's consultation on new steel import quotas has drawn criticism from German steel company Gerber Steel. The company argues that importers, distributors and smaller businesses have been given insufficient opportunities to influence the rules. Meanwhile, 44 European industry associations are calling for stronger trade defence measures.
The EU's new Steel Regulation, 2026/1384, took effect on 1 July. It introduces duty-free import quotas totalling 18.3 million tonnes and a 50 per cent tariff on imports exceeding those quotas.
According to the European Commission, the measures are intended to protect Europe's steel industry against global overcapacity and unfair competition.
Short consultation period criticised
The Commission's latest consultation ran from 28 September to 11 October. Gerber Steel argues that the period was too short to allow a thorough assessment of the regulation's consequences.
The company also claims that the questionnaire primarily targeted steel producers and processors, while importers and distributors were unable to respond to several key questions.
However, the Commission's official information indicates that other stakeholders could also submit comments. The criticism therefore mainly concerns the structure of the consultation and the questions different groups were invited to answer.
Smaller companies fear rising costs
Gerber Steel CEO Thorsten Gerber believes the Commission's approach risks favouring large steel producers over smaller importing companies.
He argues that businesses using import quotas and handling documentation on steel's origin should also have a meaningful voice.
One particular concern is the requirement to demonstrate the country in which steel was originally melted and cast. Such documentation may create additional administrative costs for importers.
Gerber Steel warns that smaller companies could face a disproportionately heavy burden.
Industry demands stronger trade protection
Meanwhile, 44 European industry associations have called for the EU to strengthen its trade defence instruments.
In a joint statement issued on 8 October, the organisations requested additional resources and more effective measures against what they consider distorted competition.
Gerber Group questions the need for further restrictions, pointing out that 232 EU trade defence measures were already in force at the end of 2025.
The company argues that additional tariffs and import restrictions should be supported by clearer evidence of their effects throughout the steel value chain.
The disagreement highlights growing tensions within Europe's steel sector. While producers seek greater protection against imports, traders and steel-consuming companies are concerned about higher costs and reduced access to materials.
Sources: Gerber Group, Stainless Espresso, 12 October 2026; European Commission; European Metals.
